<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Government Information &#187; Property Rights</title>
	<atom:link href="http://swemgovdocs.blogs.wm.edu/category/property-rights/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://swemgovdocs.blogs.wm.edu</link>
	<description>Links and annotations for national, state, and local government publications</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Jun 2013 20:15:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>In the Matter of Certain Electronic Devices .. Notice of the Commission’s Final Determination</title>
		<link>http://swemgovdocs.blogs.wm.edu/2013/06/05/in-the-matter-of-certain-electronic-devices-notice-of-the-commissions-final-determination/</link>
		<comments>http://swemgovdocs.blogs.wm.edu/2013/06/05/in-the-matter-of-certain-electronic-devices-notice-of-the-commissions-final-determination/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jun 2013 17:09:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>alan zoellner</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Copyright/Patents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Headlines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Property Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science/Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Telecommunications/Internet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://swemgovdocs.blogs.wm.edu/?p=35792</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[http://www.usitc.gov/secretary/fed_reg_notices/337/337-794_notice06042013sgl.pdf Agency ruling that Apple violated Samsung patents in developing iPhones and iPads and bans the company from further sales of older devices that work on AT&#38;T’s Wireless network.  From the U.S. International Trade Commission &#160;]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.usitc.gov/secretary/fed_reg_notices/337/337-794_notice06042013sgl.pdf">http://www.usitc.gov/secretary/fed_reg_notices/337/337-794_notice06042013sgl.pdf</p>
<p></a></p>
<p>Agency ruling that Apple violated Samsung patents in developing iPhones and iPads and bans the company from further sales of older devices that work on AT&amp;T’s Wireless network.  From the U.S. International Trade Commission</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://swemgovdocs.blogs.wm.edu/2013/06/05/in-the-matter-of-certain-electronic-devices-notice-of-the-commissions-final-determination/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>2013 Special 301 Report [on Intellectual Property Rights]</title>
		<link>http://swemgovdocs.blogs.wm.edu/2013/05/02/2013-special-301-report-on-intellectual-property-rights/</link>
		<comments>http://swemgovdocs.blogs.wm.edu/2013/05/02/2013-special-301-report-on-intellectual-property-rights/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 May 2013 13:36:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>alan zoellner</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copyright/Patents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Trade/Investment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Headlines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Property Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Treaties]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://swemgovdocs.blogs.wm.edu/?p=34982</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[http://www.ustr.gov/sites/default/files/05012013%202013%20Special%20301%20Report.pdf Reviews annually the adequacy and effectiveness of U.S. trading partners’ protection and enforcement of intellectual property rights.  Targets Ukraine and China for special attention due to deterioration of enforcement and misappropriation of trade secrets.  From the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative &#160;]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.ustr.gov/sites/default/files/05012013%202013%20Special%20301%20Report.pdf">http://www.ustr.gov/sites/default/files/05012013%202013%20Special%20301%20Report.pdf</p>
<p></a></p>
<p>Reviews annually the adequacy and effectiveness of U.S. trading partners’ protection and enforcement of intellectual property rights.  Targets Ukraine and China for special attention due to deterioration of enforcement and misappropriation of trade secrets.  From the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://swemgovdocs.blogs.wm.edu/2013/05/02/2013-special-301-report-on-intellectual-property-rights/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Integration of Drones into Domestic Airspace: Selected Legal Issues</title>
		<link>http://swemgovdocs.blogs.wm.edu/2013/01/31/integration-of-drones-into-domestic-airspace-selected-legal-issues/</link>
		<comments>http://swemgovdocs.blogs.wm.edu/2013/01/31/integration-of-drones-into-domestic-airspace-selected-legal-issues/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2013 20:35:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>alan zoellner</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Laws/Regulations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Property Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transportation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://swemgovdocs.blogs.wm.edu/?p=32594</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/natsec/R42940.pdf Discusses legal issues relating to privacy, property rights, trespassing, and airspace ownership in regard to the use of pilotless drones in U.S. airspace.  From the Congressional Research Service, posted by the Federation of American Scientists &#160;]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/natsec/R42940.pdf">http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/natsec/R42940.pdf</p>
<p></a></p>
<p>Discusses legal issues relating to privacy, property rights, trespassing, and airspace ownership in regard to the use of pilotless drones in U.S. airspace.  From the Congressional Research Service, posted by the Federation of American Scientists</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://swemgovdocs.blogs.wm.edu/2013/01/31/integration-of-drones-into-domestic-airspace-selected-legal-issues/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Endangered Species Act (ESA) and Claims of Property Rights “Takings”</title>
		<link>http://swemgovdocs.blogs.wm.edu/2013/01/09/the-endangered-species-act-esa-and-claims-of-property-rights-takings/</link>
		<comments>http://swemgovdocs.blogs.wm.edu/2013/01/09/the-endangered-species-act-esa-and-claims-of-property-rights-takings/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2013 13:00:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>alan zoellner</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Animals/Wildlife]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Laws/Regulations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Property Rights]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://swemgovdocs.blogs.wm.edu/?p=31968</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/RL31796.pdf This report outlines the ESA provisions most relevant to the act’s impacts on private property and surveys the major ESA-relevant principles of Fifth Amendment takings law.  The report then summarizes court decisions on whether particular government actions based on the ESA “take” private property.   From the Congressional Research Service, posted by the Federation of [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/RL31796.pdf">http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/RL31796.pdf</a></p>
<p>This report outlines the ESA provisions most relevant to the act’s impacts on private property and surveys the major ESA-relevant principles of Fifth Amendment takings law.  The report then summarizes court decisions on whether particular government actions based on the ESA “take” private property.   From the Congressional Research Service, posted by the Federation of American Scientists</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://swemgovdocs.blogs.wm.edu/2013/01/09/the-endangered-species-act-esa-and-claims-of-property-rights-takings/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Follow-On Biologics: The Law and Intellectual Property Issues</title>
		<link>http://swemgovdocs.blogs.wm.edu/2012/12/19/follow-on-biologics-the-law-and-intellectual-property-issues/</link>
		<comments>http://swemgovdocs.blogs.wm.edu/2012/12/19/follow-on-biologics-the-law-and-intellectual-property-issues/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2012 14:14:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>alan zoellner</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Antitrust/Monopoly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copyright/Patents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health/Medical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Laws/Regulations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Property Rights]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://swemgovdocs.blogs.wm.edu/?p=31618</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R41483.pdf Examines the market for medical preparations derived from living organisms, the lack of competition from generic drugs, the reasons for different treatment of biologics, and the legislative attempts to promote competition.  From the Congressional Research Service, posted by the Federation of American Scientists &#160;]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R41483.pdf">http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R41483.pdf</a></p>
<p>Examines the market for medical preparations derived from living organisms, the lack of competition from generic drugs, the reasons for different treatment of biologics, and the legislative attempts to promote competition.  From the Congressional Research Service, posted by the Federation of American Scientists</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://swemgovdocs.blogs.wm.edu/2012/12/19/follow-on-biologics-the-law-and-intellectual-property-issues/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Out-of-Cycle Review of Notorious Markets</title>
		<link>http://swemgovdocs.blogs.wm.edu/2012/12/14/out-of-cycle-review-of-notorious-markets-2/</link>
		<comments>http://swemgovdocs.blogs.wm.edu/2012/12/14/out-of-cycle-review-of-notorious-markets-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2012 16:52:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>alan zoellner</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Copyright/Patents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crime/Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Trade/Investment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Property Rights]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://swemgovdocs.blogs.wm.edu/?p=22144</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[http://www.ustr.gov/sites/default/files/121312%20Notorious%20Markets%20List.pdf The Notorious Markets List Identifies selected markets that engage in trademark counterfeiting and copyright piracy on a commercial scale.  Also discusses efforts made in the past year to curb such illegal market activity.  From the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative &#160;]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.ustr.gov/sites/default/files/121312%20Notorious%20Markets%20List.pdf">http://www.ustr.gov/sites/default/files/121312%20Notorious%20Markets%20List.pdf</a></p>
<p>The Notorious Markets List Identifies selected markets that engage in trademark counterfeiting and copyright piracy on a commercial scale.  Also discusses efforts made in the past year to curb such illegal market activity.  From the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://swemgovdocs.blogs.wm.edu/2012/12/14/out-of-cycle-review-of-notorious-markets-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Stealing Trade Secrets and Economic Espionage: An Overview of 18 U.S.C. 1831 and 1832</title>
		<link>http://swemgovdocs.blogs.wm.edu/2012/08/31/stealing-trade-secrets-and-economic-espionage-an-overview-of-18-u-s-c-1831-and-1832/</link>
		<comments>http://swemgovdocs.blogs.wm.edu/2012/08/31/stealing-trade-secrets-and-economic-espionage-an-overview-of-18-u-s-c-1831-and-1832/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2012 14:33:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>alan zoellner</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Copyright/Patents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crime/Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Trade/Investment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Laws/Regulations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Property Rights]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://swemgovdocs.blogs.wm.edu/?p=19454</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/secrecy/R42681.pdf Explains what constitutes the theft of trade secrets and when it becomes a federal crime.  From the Congressional Research Service, posted by the Federation of American Scientists &#160;]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/secrecy/R42681.pdf">http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/secrecy/R42681.pdf</a></p>
<p>Explains what constitutes the theft of trade secrets and when it becomes a federal crime.  From the Congressional Research Service, posted by the Federation of American Scientists</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://swemgovdocs.blogs.wm.edu/2012/08/31/stealing-trade-secrets-and-economic-espionage-an-overview-of-18-u-s-c-1831-and-1832/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Investment Climate Statements 2012</title>
		<link>http://swemgovdocs.blogs.wm.edu/2012/06/20/investment-climate-statements-2012/</link>
		<comments>http://swemgovdocs.blogs.wm.edu/2012/06/20/investment-climate-statements-2012/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2012 14:19:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>alan zoellner</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Foreign Trade/Investment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor/Employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Property Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Statistics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://swemgovdocs.blogs.wm.edu/?p=17957</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[http://www.state.gov/e/eb/rls/othr/ics/index.htm Provide descriptions of the current environments in which private investors must operate in the countries of the world.                The statements cover characteristics such as openness to foreign investment, licensing procedures, protection of property rights, dispute settlement, political corruption, labor, and transparency of the regulatory system.  Also provides statistics on levels of foreign investment.  From [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.state.gov/e/eb/rls/othr/ics/index.htm">http://www.state.gov/e/eb/rls/othr/ics/index.htm</a></p>
<p>Provide descriptions of the current environments in which private investors must operate in the countries of the world.                The statements cover characteristics such as openness to foreign investment, licensing procedures, protection of property rights, dispute settlement, political corruption, labor, and transparency of the regulatory system.  Also provides statistics on levels of foreign investment.  From the State Department</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://swemgovdocs.blogs.wm.edu/2012/06/20/investment-climate-statements-2012/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>2012 Special 301 Report</title>
		<link>http://swemgovdocs.blogs.wm.edu/2012/05/03/2012-special-301-report/</link>
		<comments>http://swemgovdocs.blogs.wm.edu/2012/05/03/2012-special-301-report/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2012 19:06:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>alan zoellner</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copyright/Patents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Trade/Investment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Italy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Property Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Treaties]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://swemgovdocs.blogs.wm.edu/?p=17286</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[http://www.ustr.gov/sites/default/files/2012%20Special%20301%20Report_0.pdf Latest annual review of the state of intellectual property rights protection and enforcement by U.S. trading partners around the world.  Major concerns are expressed about indigenous innovation policies in China, copyright piracy over the Internet in Canada, Italy, and Russia, and other systemic IPR issues.  From the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative &#160;]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.ustr.gov/sites/default/files/2012%20Special%20301%20Report_0.pdf">http://www.ustr.gov/sites/default/files/2012%20Special%20301%20Report_0.pdf</a></p>
<p>Latest annual review of the state of intellectual property rights protection and enforcement by U.S. trading partners around the world.  Major concerns are expressed about indigenous innovation policies in China, copyright piracy over the Internet in Canada, Italy, and Russia, and other systemic IPR issues.  From the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://swemgovdocs.blogs.wm.edu/2012/05/03/2012-special-301-report/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>United States v. Jones: GPS Monitoring, Property, and Privacy</title>
		<link>http://swemgovdocs.blogs.wm.edu/2012/05/02/united-states-v-jones-gps-monitoring-property-and-privacy/</link>
		<comments>http://swemgovdocs.blogs.wm.edu/2012/05/02/united-states-v-jones-gps-monitoring-property-and-privacy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2012 19:51:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>alan zoellner</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Crime/Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Property Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science/Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court/courts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://swemgovdocs.blogs.wm.edu/?p=17248</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R42511.pdf Discusses the implications of a Supreme Court decision where police monitored a suspect’s movements by attaching a GPS device to his car.  The report examines different opinions from different jurists and how each relates to issues of privacy, property, and  technology.  From the Congressional Research Service, posted by the Federation of American Scientists &#160;]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R42511.pdf">http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R42511.pdf</a></p>
<p>Discusses the implications of a Supreme Court decision where police monitored a suspect’s movements by attaching a GPS device to his car.  The report examines different opinions from different jurists and how each relates to issues of privacy, property, and  technology.  From the Congressional Research Service, posted by the Federation of American Scientists</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://swemgovdocs.blogs.wm.edu/2012/05/02/united-states-v-jones-gps-monitoring-property-and-privacy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sackett v. EPA</title>
		<link>http://swemgovdocs.blogs.wm.edu/2012/03/22/sackett-v-epa/</link>
		<comments>http://swemgovdocs.blogs.wm.edu/2012/03/22/sackett-v-epa/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2012 13:05:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>alan zoellner</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Property Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court/courts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://swemgovdocs.blogs.wm.edu/?p=16694</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[http://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/10-1062 Unanimous Supreme Court decision that property owners can challenge federal agency decisions relating to the use of their property by seeking judicial review of the agency decision.  The case involved Idaho property owners who were prevented from building a house on land that the Environmental Protection Agency considered a protected wetland.  From the Cornell [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/10-1062">http://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/10-1062</a></p>
<p>Unanimous Supreme Court decision that property owners can challenge federal agency decisions relating to the use of their property by seeking judicial review of the agency decision.  The case involved Idaho property owners who were prevented from building a house on land that the Environmental Protection Agency considered a protected wetland.  From the Cornell University Legal Information Institute</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://swemgovdocs.blogs.wm.edu/2012/03/22/sackett-v-epa/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Out-of-Cycle Review of Notorious Markets</title>
		<link>http://swemgovdocs.blogs.wm.edu/2011/12/22/out-of-cycle-review-of-notorious-markets/</link>
		<comments>http://swemgovdocs.blogs.wm.edu/2011/12/22/out-of-cycle-review-of-notorious-markets/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2011 19:25:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>alan zoellner</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Copyright/Patents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Trade/Investment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Property Rights]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://swemgovdocs.blogs.wm.edu/?p=15561</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[http://www.ustr.gov/webfm_send/3215 The Notorious Markets List identifies selected markets, including ones on the Internet, that deal in goods and services that violate intellectual property rights.  From the  Office of the U.S. Trade Representative &#160;]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.ustr.gov/webfm_send/3215">http://www.ustr.gov/webfm_send/3215</a></p>
<p>The Notorious Markets List identifies selected markets, including ones on the Internet, that deal in goods and services that violate intellectual property rights.  From the  Office of the U.S. Trade Representative</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://swemgovdocs.blogs.wm.edu/2011/12/22/out-of-cycle-review-of-notorious-markets/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Request for Information: Public Access to Peer-Reviewed Scholarly Publications Resulting from Federally Funded Research</title>
		<link>http://swemgovdocs.blogs.wm.edu/2011/11/07/request-for-information-public-access-to-peer-reviewed-scholarly-publications-resulting-from-federally-funded-research/</link>
		<comments>http://swemgovdocs.blogs.wm.edu/2011/11/07/request-for-information-public-access-to-peer-reviewed-scholarly-publications-resulting-from-federally-funded-research/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2011 19:36:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>alan zoellner</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Copyright/Patents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Govt Information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libraries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Property Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science/Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://swemgovdocs.blogs.wm.edu/?p=14942</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[http://www.federalregister.gov/articles/2011/11/04/2011-28623/request-for-information-public-access-to-peer-reviewed-scholarly-publications-resulting-from#h-6 Seeks insight from non-federal stakeholders with an interest in long-term preservation and access to the results of federally funded research.  In particular, the Request for Information seeks answers to eight questions  relating to public access, intellectual property rights, public/private partnerships,  and so forth.  From the Office of Science and Technology Policy &#160;]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.federalregister.gov/articles/2011/11/04/2011-28623/request-for-information-public-access-to-peer-reviewed-scholarly-publications-resulting-from#h-6">http://www.federalregister.gov/articles/2011/11/04/2011-28623/request-for-information-public-access-to-peer-reviewed-scholarly-publications-resulting-from#h-6</a></p>
<p>Seeks insight from non-federal stakeholders with an interest in long-term preservation and access to the results of federally funded research.  In particular, the Request for Information seeks answers to eight questions  relating to public access, intellectual property rights, public/private partnerships,  and so forth.  From the Office of Science and Technology Policy</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://swemgovdocs.blogs.wm.edu/2011/11/07/request-for-information-public-access-to-peer-reviewed-scholarly-publications-resulting-from-federally-funded-research/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Illegal Internet Streaming of Copyrighted Content: Legislation in the 112th Congress</title>
		<link>http://swemgovdocs.blogs.wm.edu/2011/09/21/illegal-internet-streaming-of-copyrighted-content-legislation-in-the-112th-congress/</link>
		<comments>http://swemgovdocs.blogs.wm.edu/2011/09/21/illegal-internet-streaming-of-copyrighted-content-legislation-in-the-112th-congress/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2011 19:49:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>alan zoellner</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Copyright/Patents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Laws/Regulations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Property Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Telecommunications/Internet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://swemgovdocs.blogs.wm.edu/?p=14339</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[http://ipmall.info/hosted_resources/crs/R41975_110829.pdf Provides a brief background on copyright law and Internet streaming of copyrighted content, the misuse of such content by rogue websites, and legislation in the 112th Congress aimed at preventing copyright infringement.   From the Congressional Research Service, posted by Pierce Law IP Mall &#160;]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://ipmall.info/hosted_resources/crs/R41975_110829.pdf">http://ipmall.info/hosted_resources/crs/R41975_110829.pdf</a></p>
<p>Provides a brief background on copyright law and Internet streaming of copyrighted content, the misuse of such content by rogue websites, and legislation in the 112<sup>th</sup> Congress aimed at preventing copyright infringement.   From the Congressional Research Service, posted by Pierce Law IP Mall</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://swemgovdocs.blogs.wm.edu/2011/09/21/illegal-internet-streaming-of-copyrighted-content-legislation-in-the-112th-congress/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Local Information Programming and the Structure of Television Markets</title>
		<link>http://swemgovdocs.blogs.wm.edu/2011/07/29/local-information-programming-and-the-structure-of-television-markets/</link>
		<comments>http://swemgovdocs.blogs.wm.edu/2011/07/29/local-information-programming-and-the-structure-of-television-markets/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2011 16:21:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>alan zoellner</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Advertising/Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Antitrust/Monopoly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Property Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Telecommunications/Internet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://swemgovdocs.blogs.wm.edu/?p=13679</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[http://transition.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Business/2011/db0721/DOC-308508A1.pdf Examines how the ownership structure in a television market impacts the quantity of local news and public affairs programming provided by television stations.  From the Federal Communications Commission &#160; &#160;]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://transition.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Business/2011/db0721/DOC-308508A1.pdf">http://transition.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Business/2011/db0721/DOC-308508A1.pdf</a></p>
<p>Examines how the ownership structure in a television market impacts the quantity of local news and public affairs programming provided by television stations.  From the Federal Communications Commission</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://swemgovdocs.blogs.wm.edu/2011/07/29/local-information-programming-and-the-structure-of-television-markets/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Federal Facilities Map</title>
		<link>http://swemgovdocs.blogs.wm.edu/2011/06/09/new-federal-facilities-map/</link>
		<comments>http://swemgovdocs.blogs.wm.edu/2011/06/09/new-federal-facilities-map/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jun 2011 12:25:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>alan zoellner</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Defense/Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maps/Geography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Property Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virginia Issues]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://swemgovdocs.blogs.wm.edu/?p=13151</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[http://www.hrpdcva.gov/Documents/Phys%20Planning/Special%20Reports/2011/SR_NewFedFacilitiesMap.pdf Shows extent of land owned by federal government in each of the Hampton Roads localities.  Overall the federal government owns 9% of the land area of Hampton Roads but 34% of York County, the largest federal holding in an area locality.  From the Hampton Roads Plan District Commission &#160;]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.hrpdcva.gov/Documents/Phys%20Planning/Special%20Reports/2011/SR_NewFedFacilitiesMap.pdf">http://www.hrpdcva.gov/Documents/Phys%20Planning/Special%20Reports/2011/SR_NewFedFacilitiesMap.pdf</a></p>
<p>Shows extent of land owned by federal government in each of the Hampton Roads localities.  Overall the federal government owns 9% of the land area of Hampton Roads but 34% of York County, the largest federal holding in an area locality.  From the Hampton Roads Plan District Commission</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://swemgovdocs.blogs.wm.edu/2011/06/09/new-federal-facilities-map/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Stanford University v. Roche Molecular Systems</title>
		<link>http://swemgovdocs.blogs.wm.edu/2011/06/08/stanford-university-v-roche-molecular-systems/</link>
		<comments>http://swemgovdocs.blogs.wm.edu/2011/06/08/stanford-university-v-roche-molecular-systems/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jun 2011 12:33:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>alan zoellner</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Copyright/Patents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Headlines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Property Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court/courts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://swemgovdocs.blogs.wm.edu/?p=13142</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[http://laws.findlaw.com/us/000/09-1159 7-2 decision of the Supreme Court in a case involving patent rights to inventions, in this case HIV test kits, where the research work involves both university and private labs.  The court ruled that patent rights do not automatically go to federal contractors when the invention derives from federal funding.  From Findlaw.com &#160;]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://laws.findlaw.com/us/000/09-1159">http://laws.findlaw.com/us/000/09-1159</a></p>
<p>7-2 decision of the Supreme Court in a case involving patent rights to inventions, in this case HIV test kits, where the research work involves both university and private labs.  The court ruled that patent rights do not automatically go to federal contractors when the invention derives from federal funding.  From Findlaw.com</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://swemgovdocs.blogs.wm.edu/2011/06/08/stanford-university-v-roche-molecular-systems/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Digital Opportunity: A Review of Intellectual Property and Growth</title>
		<link>http://swemgovdocs.blogs.wm.edu/2011/05/26/digital-opportunity-a-review-of-intellectual-property-and-growth/</link>
		<comments>http://swemgovdocs.blogs.wm.edu/2011/05/26/digital-opportunity-a-review-of-intellectual-property-and-growth/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 May 2011 12:38:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>alan zoellner</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Copyright/Patents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Great Britain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Property Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science/Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://swemgovdocs.blogs.wm.edu/?p=12971</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[http://www.ipo.gov.uk/ipreview-finalreport.pdf Task Force report that calls for loosening up on copyright rules and creating a Digital Copyright Exchange to promote innovation and economic growth while protecting artistic property.   From the British Intellectual Property Office]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.ipo.gov.uk/ipreview-finalreport.pdf">http://www.ipo.gov.uk/ipreview-finalreport.pdf</a></p>
<p>Task Force report that calls for loosening up on copyright rules and creating a Digital Copyright Exchange to promote innovation and economic growth while protecting artistic property.   From the British Intellectual Property Office</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://swemgovdocs.blogs.wm.edu/2011/05/26/digital-opportunity-a-review-of-intellectual-property-and-growth/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>2011 Special 301 Report on Intellectual Property</title>
		<link>http://swemgovdocs.blogs.wm.edu/2011/05/04/2011-special-301-report-on-intellectual-property/</link>
		<comments>http://swemgovdocs.blogs.wm.edu/2011/05/04/2011-special-301-report-on-intellectual-property/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 May 2011 17:04:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>alan zoellner</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copyright/Patents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Trade/Investment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Italy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Property Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spain]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://swemgovdocs.blogs.wm.edu/?p=12819</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[http://www.ustr.gov/about-us/press-office/reports-and-publications/2011/2011-special-301-report Latest annual review of the global state of intellectual property rights protection and enforcement.  Identifies a wide range of U.S. concerns including indigenous innovation policies in China, copyright piracy over the Internet in such countries as Canada, Spain, Italy, and Russia, and more.   From the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.ustr.gov/about-us/press-office/reports-and-publications/2011/2011-special-301-report">http://www.ustr.gov/about-us/press-office/reports-and-publications/2011/2011-special-301-report</a></p>
<p>Latest annual review of the global state of intellectual property rights protection and enforcement.  Identifies a wide range of U.S. concerns including indigenous innovation policies in China, copyright piracy over the Internet in such countries as Canada, Spain, Italy, and Russia, and more.   From the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://swemgovdocs.blogs.wm.edu/2011/05/04/2011-special-301-report-on-intellectual-property/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Executive Order: Libya</title>
		<link>http://swemgovdocs.blogs.wm.edu/2011/03/23/executive-order-libya/</link>
		<comments>http://swemgovdocs.blogs.wm.edu/2011/03/23/executive-order-libya/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2011 18:58:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>alan zoellner</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Africa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Property Rights]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://swemgovdocs.blogs.wm.edu/?p=12328</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2011/02/25/executive-order-libya Executive order which blocks the transfer of funds or property to Libya to prevent misuse by Colonel Qadhafi or members of his family or government.  From the White House]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2011/02/25/executive-order-libya">http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2011/02/25/executive-order-libya</a></p>
<p>Executive order which blocks the transfer of funds or property to Libya to prevent misuse by Colonel Qadhafi or members of his family or government.  From the White House</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://swemgovdocs.blogs.wm.edu/2011/03/23/executive-order-libya/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Executive Order—Libya</title>
		<link>http://swemgovdocs.blogs.wm.edu/2011/03/04/executive-order%e2%80%94libya/</link>
		<comments>http://swemgovdocs.blogs.wm.edu/2011/03/04/executive-order%e2%80%94libya/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2011 15:10:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>alan zoellner</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Africa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Laws/Regulations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Property Rights]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://swemgovdocs.blogs.wm.edu/?p=12150</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2011/02/25/executive-order-libya Blocks property and prohibits transfer of assets under U.S. control to officials of the Libyan government or members of Colonel Muammar Qadhafi’s family.  From the White House]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2011/02/25/executive-order-libya">http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2011/02/25/executive-order-libya</a></p>
<p>Blocks property and prohibits transfer of assets under U.S. control to officials of the Libyan government or members of Colonel Muammar Qadhafi’s family.  From the White House</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://swemgovdocs.blogs.wm.edu/2011/03/04/executive-order%e2%80%94libya/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Role of Trade Secrets in Innovation Policy</title>
		<link>http://swemgovdocs.blogs.wm.edu/2010/10/20/the-role-of-trade-secrets-in-innovation-policy/</link>
		<comments>http://swemgovdocs.blogs.wm.edu/2010/10/20/the-role-of-trade-secrets-in-innovation-policy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Oct 2010 19:30:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>alan zoellner</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business/Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copyright/Patents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Laws/Regulations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Property Rights]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://swemgovdocs.blogs.wm.edu/?p=10553</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/secrecy/R41391.pdf Describes the importance of business trade secrets as intellectual property in the era of knowledge-based economies, the nature of trade secret law that protects it, and how federal legislation affects the attractiveness of patents and other trade secrets.  From the Congressional Research Service, posted by OpenCRS.org]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/secrecy/R41391.pdf">http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/secrecy/R41391.pdf</a></p>
<p>Describes the importance of business trade secrets as intellectual property in the era of knowledge-based economies, the nature of trade secret law that protects it, and how federal legislation affects the attractiveness of patents and other trade secrets.  From the Congressional Research Service, posted by OpenCRS.org</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://swemgovdocs.blogs.wm.edu/2010/10/20/the-role-of-trade-secrets-in-innovation-policy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Stop the Beach Renourishment v. Florida Department of Environmental Protection</title>
		<link>http://swemgovdocs.blogs.wm.edu/2010/06/17/stop-the-beach-renourishment-v-florida-department-of-environmental-protection/</link>
		<comments>http://swemgovdocs.blogs.wm.edu/2010/06/17/stop-the-beach-renourishment-v-florida-department-of-environmental-protection/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jun 2010 20:41:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>alan zoellner</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Property Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court/courts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://swemgovdocs.blogs.wm.edu/?p=9014</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[http://laws.findlaw.com/us/000/08-1151 8-0 Supreme Court decision that the Florida environmental agency had not unconstitutionally taken land from beach homeowners in restoring the beachfront and claiming the land for the state.  At issue was whether the case involved a taking of private property.  From Findlaw.com]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://laws.findlaw.com/us/000/08-1151">http://laws.findlaw.com/us/000/08-1151</a></p>
<p>8-0 Supreme Court decision that the Florida environmental agency had not unconstitutionally taken land from beach homeowners in restoring the beachfront and claiming the land for the state.  At issue was whether the case involved a taking of private property.  From Findlaw.com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://swemgovdocs.blogs.wm.edu/2010/06/17/stop-the-beach-renourishment-v-florida-department-of-environmental-protection/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>2010 Special 301 Report</title>
		<link>http://swemgovdocs.blogs.wm.edu/2010/05/05/2010-special-301-report/</link>
		<comments>http://swemgovdocs.blogs.wm.edu/2010/05/05/2010-special-301-report/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 May 2010 12:36:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>alan zoellner</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copyright/Patents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crime/Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Trade/Investment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[India]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pakistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Property Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Telecommunications/Internet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://swemgovdocs.blogs.wm.edu/?p=8353</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[http://www.ustr.gov/about-us/press-office/reports-and-publications/2010-3 Latest annual report on U.S. concerns with protection for copyright and intellectual property.  Places 11 countries, including China, Russia, India, Canada, and Pakistan,  on a priority watch list.  From the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative.]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.ustr.gov/about-us/press-office/reports-and-publications/2010-3">http://www.ustr.gov/about-us/press-office/reports-and-publications/2010-3</a></p>
<p>Latest annual report on U.S. concerns with protection for copyright and intellectual property.  Places 11 countries, including China, Russia, India, Canada, and Pakistan,  on a priority watch list.  From the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://swemgovdocs.blogs.wm.edu/2010/05/05/2010-special-301-report/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Property Value: 2007 and 2008 American Community Surveys</title>
		<link>http://swemgovdocs.blogs.wm.edu/2009/09/23/property-value-2007-and-2008-american-community-surveys/</link>
		<comments>http://swemgovdocs.blogs.wm.edu/2009/09/23/property-value-2007-and-2008-american-community-surveys/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 15:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Housing/Homelessness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Property Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Statistics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://swemgovdocs.blogs.wm.edu/2009/09/23/property-value-2007-and-2008-american-community-surveys/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[http://www.census.gov/prod/2009pubs/acsbr08-6.pdf&#13; &#13; Presents statistics on median property value by states ranging from $576,000 in Hawaii and $552,000 in California to $99,000 in Mississippi and West Virginia. Also shows the change in property value from 2007 to 2008. From the Census Bureau.]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.census.gov/prod/2009pubs/acsbr08-6.pdf">http://www.census.gov/prod/2009pubs/acsbr08-6.pdf</a>&#13;<br />
&#13;<br />
Presents statistics on median property value by states ranging from $576,000 in Hawaii and $552,000 in California to $99,000 in Mississippi and West Virginia.  Also shows the change in property value from 2007 to 2008.  From the Census Bureau.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://swemgovdocs.blogs.wm.edu/2009/09/23/property-value-2007-and-2008-american-community-surveys/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Criminal Victimization, 2006</title>
		<link>http://swemgovdocs.blogs.wm.edu/2007/12/14/criminal-victimization-2006/</link>
		<comments>http://swemgovdocs.blogs.wm.edu/2007/12/14/criminal-victimization-2006/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 14:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Crime/Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Property Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Statistics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://swemgovdocs.blogs.wm.edu/2007/12/14/criminal-victimization-2006/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/abstract/cv06.htm&#13; &#13; Presents estimates of rates and levels of personal and property crime victimization for 2006. Discloses that males experienced higher levels of victimization than females and that violent and property crime rates in urban and suburban areas were stable between 2005 and 2006. From the Bureau of Justice Statistics.]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/abstract/cv06.htm">http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/abstract/cv06.htm</a>&#13;<br />
&#13;<br />
Presents estimates of rates and levels of personal and property crime victimization for 2006. Discloses that males experienced higher levels of victimization than females and that violent and property crime rates  in urban and suburban areas were stable between 2005 and 2006.  From the Bureau of Justice Statistics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://swemgovdocs.blogs.wm.edu/2007/12/14/criminal-victimization-2006/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Base Structure Report Fiscal Year 2007 Baseline: A Summary of DOD&#8217;s Real Property Inventory</title>
		<link>http://swemgovdocs.blogs.wm.edu/2007/09/10/base-structure-report-fiscal-year-2007-baseline-a-summary-of-dods-real-property-inventory/</link>
		<comments>http://swemgovdocs.blogs.wm.edu/2007/09/10/base-structure-report-fiscal-year-2007-baseline-a-summary-of-dods-real-property-inventory/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2007 20:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Defense/Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Property Rights]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://swemgovdocs.blogs.wm.edu/2007/09/10/base-structure-report-fiscal-year-2007-baseline-a-summary-of-dods-real-property-inventory/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[http://www.defenselink.mil/pubs/BSR_2007_Baseline.pdf&#13; &#13; Provides a comprehensive listing of sites owned or used by the Department of Defense. Organized by state/country and then by military organization. From the Defense Department.]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.defenselink.mil/pubs/BSR_2007_Baseline.pdf">http://www.defenselink.mil/pubs/BSR_2007_Baseline.pdf</a>&#13;<br />
&#13;<br />
Provides a comprehensive listing of sites owned or used by the Department of Defense.  Organized by state/country and then by military organization.  From the Defense Department.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://swemgovdocs.blogs.wm.edu/2007/09/10/base-structure-report-fiscal-year-2007-baseline-a-summary-of-dods-real-property-inventory/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Eminent Domain: Information About Its Uses and Effect on Property Owners and Communities &#8230;</title>
		<link>http://swemgovdocs.blogs.wm.edu/2006/12/01/eminent-domain-information-about-its-uses-and-effect-on-property-owners-and-communities/</link>
		<comments>http://swemgovdocs.blogs.wm.edu/2006/12/01/eminent-domain-information-about-its-uses-and-effect-on-property-owners-and-communities/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Dec 2006 15:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Govt Finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Property Rights]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://swemgovdocs.blogs.wm.edu/2006/12/01/eminent-domain-information-about-its-uses-and-effect-on-property-owners-and-communities/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d0728.pdf&#13; &#13; Reports on the purposes for which eminent domain can be and has been used, the process states and localities use to acquire land, how the use of eminent domain has affected individuals and communities, and the changes 29 state legislatures have made to laws governing the use of eminent domain since a controversial [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d0728.pdf">http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d0728.pdf</a>&#13;<br />
&#13;<br />
Reports on the purposes for which eminent domain can be and has been used, the process states and localities use to acquire land, how the use of eminent domain has affected individuals and communities, and the changes 29 state legislatures have made to laws governing the use of eminent domain since a controversial 2005 Supreme Court decision.  From the Government Accountability Office.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://swemgovdocs.blogs.wm.edu/2006/12/01/eminent-domain-information-about-its-uses-and-effect-on-property-owners-and-communities/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>KELO V. CITY OF NEW LONDON</title>
		<link>http://swemgovdocs.blogs.wm.edu/2005/06/25/kelo-v-city-of-new-london/</link>
		<comments>http://swemgovdocs.blogs.wm.edu/2005/06/25/kelo-v-city-of-new-london/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jun 2005 19:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Govt Processes/Organization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Headlines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Property Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court/courts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://swemgovdocs.blogs.wm.edu/2005/06/25/kelo-v-city-of-new-london/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=US&#38;vol=000&#38;invol=04-108&#13; &#13; Supreme Court decision that affirmed the power of local governments to seize private property for public purposes. Officials of New London, Connecticut want to condemn properties in a neighborhood of modest homes to create a privately developed hotel/office complex to boost economic growth]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=US&amp;vol=000&amp;invol=04-108">http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=US&amp;vol=000&amp;invol=04-108</a>&#13;<br />
&#13;<br />
Supreme Court decision that affirmed the power of local governments to seize private property for public purposes. Officials of New London, Connecticut want to condemn properties in a neighborhood of modest homes to create a privately developed hotel/office complex to boost economic growth</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://swemgovdocs.blogs.wm.edu/2005/06/25/kelo-v-city-of-new-london/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
